Govern AI decisions with the rigor they demand
Register, monitor, and govern every AI model in your enterprise. Detect bias and drift, enforce human-in-the-loop policies, and maintain the audit trails regulators require — from EU AI Act to NYC Local Law 144.
Governance gaps that structured controls and audit trails eliminate.
Unsanctioned AI tools proliferate across teams with no inventory or risk scoring. Shadow AI Discovery inventories every tool and scores risk per team, while Agent Authority Boundary ensures agents stay inside their delegated envelope.
Deployed AI surfaces are vulnerable to adversarial inputs that bypass safety controls. Prompt Injection Exposure quantifies your attack surface, and LLM Jailbreak Resilience stress-tests defenses against evolving jailbreak corpora.
When AI produces a bad output, tracing it back to the responsible prompt, model version, and human edit is impossible. AI Output Attribution Chain and Model Provenance Attestation close this gap.
Human-in-the-loop checkpoints exist on paper but don't change outcomes in practice. Human-in-the-Loop Efficacy measures whether HITL reviews actually alter decisions or just add latency.
Real governance scenarios powered by DecisionLedger.
Runs Shadow AI Discovery across all teams, uncovering 23 unsanctioned AI tools. Scores each with Agent Authority Boundary, then uses Autonomy Graduation Readiness to determine which agents are safe for autonomous operation.
Full AI inventory with risk tiers — 8 tools flagged for remediation, 4 graduated to autonomous
Uses AI Evaluator Calibration to detect a 12% drift in their LLM-as-judge scoring. Runs Human-in-the-Loop Efficacy to prove HITL reviews are changing outcomes. Generates EU AI Act evidence from Model Provenance Attestation and AI Output Attribution Chain.
Calibration drift caught before regulatory review — compliance evidence generated automatically
After a prompt injection incident, runs Prompt Injection Exposure across all AI surfaces and LLM Jailbreak Resilience stress tests. Uses Tool Call Chain Risk to identify agent workflows with unsafe rollback paths, then deploys the kill switch on high-risk agents.
Attack surface quantified, 3 vulnerable surfaces hardened, incident contained with full audit trail
Based on platform benchmarks across early adopters.
Not just models about AI risk — actual enforcement tools that register, monitor, and control every AI agent and model in your organization.
Register every AI agent with per-agent permissions, activity monitoring, and instant suspension. Know exactly what AI is doing across your organization.
Circuit breaker for any AI model or agent. One-click disable across your entire tenant with automatic cool-down re-enable when you're ready.
Test new models in production without affecting live decisions or audit logs. Validate AI outputs side-by-side before going live.
Statistical bias detection across protected classes with a dedicated bias dashboard. Surface disparate impact before it becomes a compliance finding.
Every prediction comes with SHAP waterfall plots showing feature importance and input-to-output transparency. No more black-box AI decisions.
Define enforceable constraints with JSONLogic rules. Auto-flag, block, or escalate violations with full override tracking and rationale logging.
Monitor policy and guardrail effectiveness over time with automated alerts when controls go stale. Detect when regulatory or policy changes invalidate existing controls.
Pre-mapped controls for EU AI Act, NYC Local Law 144, SOX 302/404, and DOL Fiduciary Rule. Generate compliance evidence automatically from your governance activity.
Connects With
Pre-built decision models ready to run with your data.
Formal AIA as quantitative decision model with statistical bias analysis, EU AI Act article scoring, and remediation roadmap
Scores whether an AI agent's proposed action falls inside its delegated authority envelope.
Quantifies organizational exposure to prompt injection across deployed AI surfaces.
Detects drift in LLM-as-judge scoring relative to human ground truth.
Verifies model lineage, training data attestation, and supply-chain trust.
Scores reproducibility risk of agent decisions when re-executed against changed external state.
Measures retrieval grounding strength, hallucination probability, and citation faithfulness.
Detects anomalous per-team or per-feature LLM spend.
Inventories unsanctioned AI tool usage with risk scoring per tool/team.
Measures whether HITL checkpoints actually change outcomes versus rubber-stamping.
Decides whether an AI workflow has earned the right to move from supervised to autonomous operation.
Detects when multiple AI agents converge on outcomes that bypass intended controls.
Scores risk in agent tool-call chains based on depth, side-effect surface, and rollback feasibility.
Tracks which prompt, model version, retrieval source, and human edits produced a given output.
Detects synthetic content used as training input or evidence with provenance tracking.
Captures the customer's appeal channel, response SLA, and review record.
Scores extraction risk of confidential or PII training data from fine-tuned models.
Pre-deployment scoring of whether an agent can be safely halted mid-execution.
Tests deployed AI surfaces against jailbreak corpus and tracks resilience drift.
Scores switching cost across model providers including prompt portability and contract terms.
Scores AI incident postmortems against structured template.
Three steps to structured, auditable decisions.
Run Shadow AI Discovery to inventory unsanctioned tools, then score each agent with Agent Authority Boundary and Prompt Injection Exposure to quantify your attack surface and authority gaps.
Stress-test with LLM Jailbreak Resilience, verify RAG Grounding Quality for hallucination risk, and audit Tool Call Chain Risk to ensure agent workflows can be safely rolled back.
Track AI Evaluator Calibration for scoring drift, measure Human-in-the-Loop Efficacy to prevent rubber-stamping, and detect Multi-Agent Check Bypass before controls are circumvented.
Use Autonomy Graduation Readiness to decide when workflows can move from supervised to autonomous. Maintain full provenance with AI Output Attribution Chain and Model Provenance Attestation.
Spreadsheet AI inventories
Static model lists with no risk scoring, authority boundaries, or jailbreak testing
Manual compliance documentation
No automated provenance attestation or output attribution chain
MLOps tools without governance
Track model versions but not prompt injection exposure, HITL efficacy, or agent authority
GRC add-on modules
Generic risk tools that don't understand agent tool chains, RAG grounding, or multi-agent bypass risks