Planning platforms model scenarios. DecisionLedger governs the decisions they inform. Add approval workflows, audit trails, and outcome tracking to financial modeling.
| Feature | Anaplan | DecisionLedger AI |
|---|---|---|
| Financial modeling | Connected planning platform | 18 finance models with 6 simulation methods |
| Scenario planning | Multi-dimensional scenarios | Monte Carlo, stress testing, and sensitivity analysis |
| Decision governance | Approval workflows, policies, guardrails, and deliberation rooms | |
| Audit trail | Model change logs | Immutable decision audit trail with S3 Object Lock |
| AI governance | Agent registry, kill switch, bias auditing, SHAP explainability | |
| Outcome tracking | Forecast accuracy tracking with calibration reports | |
| Decision models beyond finance | 150+ models across HR, operations, strategy, M&A, and more | |
| Market benchmarks | FRED, BLS, SEC EDGAR integrated benchmarks with drift alerts | |
| Board reporting | Manual exports | Board portal with committee voting and AI meeting minutes |
| Bias detection | Statistical bias auditing across protected classes |
Why connected planning without decision governance leaves critical gaps.
FP&A models run without approval workflows, decision policies, or governance guardrails. When the board asks who approved a capital allocation and why, there's no structured trail.
Connected planning platforms model financial scenarios but don't extend to HR, operations, strategy, or M&A decisions. Business decisions span domains — your modeling platform should too.
Complex planning models embed assumptions that aren't transparent or auditable. Without SHAP explainability and bias detection, model outputs are trusted on faith.
Forecasts are made, budgets are set, but actual outcomes are rarely compared to predictions. Without outcome tracking and calibration, the same forecasting errors repeat every cycle.