AI-powered federal grant management with 2 CFR 200 built in
The only platform that combines decision intelligence with federal grant compliance - 8 purpose-built models covering every stage from award through closeout, with 2 CFR 200 rules encoded directly into the analysis.
Governance gaps that structured controls and audit trails eliminate.
Single Audit findings catch you off guard. Score readiness across 12 compliance areas covering Subpart F, cost principles, and procurement standards before auditors arrive.
Allocating shared costs across federal awards is error-prone and high-stakes. LP-optimized allocation models enforce 2 CFR 200.405 consistently and defensibly.
Pass-through entities struggle with 2 CFR 200.332 requirements. Six-factor risk models score subrecipients and flag monitoring gaps before they become findings.
Timing grant drawdowns to meet 2 CFR 200.305 cash management requirements is a manual guessing game. Monte Carlo forecasting models project P10/P50/P90 scenarios.
Executive orders, OMB memos, and regulatory changes ripple through your grant portfolio. Model the financial and compliance impact before it hits.
Structured grant management from award evaluation through allocation, monitoring, and audit-ready closeout.
Structured grant evaluation with scoring rubrics, conflict-of-interest checks, and selection modeling.
LP-optimized cost allocation across grants with allowability rules and indirect cost recovery.
Continuous compliance monitoring against 2 CFR 200 with early warning on questioned costs.
Automated evidence packaging, final reporting, and audit-ready documentation assembly.
Real governance scenarios powered by DecisionLedger.
Runs the audit readiness scorer 60 days before Single Audit fieldwork, identifies 3 compliance areas below threshold, and remediates documentation gaps before auditors arrive.
Zero audit findings for the first time in 4 years - from 5 findings the prior cycle
Uses Monte Carlo drawdown forecasting to project cash needs across 12 federal awards, optimizing draw timing to minimize idle cash while meeting 2 CFR 200.305 requirements.
Eliminated excess cash balances and reduced drawdown-related questioned costs to zero
Models the impact of a new OMB memo on cost allocation across the grant portfolio, identifying 3 awards where current allocations would become non-compliant under the new guidance.
Proactively adjusted allocations 90 days before the effective date - no disruption to operations
Scores 15 subrecipients using the six-factor risk model, identifies 4 requiring enhanced monitoring, and generates risk-based monitoring plans with site visit schedules.
Subrecipient monitoring program upgraded from ad-hoc to risk-based, satisfying auditor recommendations
Based on platform benchmarks across early adopters.
Audit Findings
Cost Allocation
Drawdown Compliance
Audit Prep Time
Subrecipient Monitoring
Policy Impact
Every model encodes 2 CFR 200 rules directly - cost principles, audit requirements, cash management, and subrecipient monitoring. Not a generic risk tool with a grants label.
Real-time burn rates, obligation tracking, and compliance scores across your entire grant portfolio. See which awards need attention at a glance.
Project cash needs with P10/P50/P90 confidence intervals. Model drawdown timing against 2 CFR 200.305 cash management requirements.
Linear programming-based cost allocation across multiple federal awards. Maximizes allowable recovery while enforcing 2 CFR 200.405 cost principles.
MCDA-based scoring across financial management, procurement, property management, subrecipient monitoring, and 8 more compliance domains.
Six-factor risk model covering financial stability, prior audit findings, program complexity, monitoring history, compliance capacity, and award size.
Isolation forest and Z-score analysis flag unusual spending patterns, budget category deviations, and velocity changes before they become audit findings.
Connects With
Part of 150+ native integrations across CRM, marketing, finance, HR, ecommerce, and analytics
Salesforce
Workday
Slack
NetSuite
Power BI
Salesforce
Workday
Slack
NetSuite
Power BIPre-built decision models ready to run with your data.
Comprehensive compliance risk assessment across 10 areas of 2 CFR 200 Uniform Guidance with financial exposure quantification and remediation prioritization.
Optimizes cost allocation across federal grants using linear programming per 2 CFR §200.405 allowability, allocability, and reasonableness requirements.
Monte Carlo simulation of grant drawdown trajectories per 2 CFR §200.305 to project fund exhaustion dates, underspending risk, and optimal drawdown schedules.
Scores organizational readiness for Single Audit (2 CFR Part 200 Subpart F) across documentation completeness, internal controls, personnel qualifications, and system capabilities.
Assesses risk levels for subrecipients on federal awards per 2 CFR §200.332 evaluating financial stability, prior audit results, compliance history, and monitoring adequacy.
Tracks milestones, deliverables, and reporting deadlines across a federal grant portfolio. Flags overdue items, assesses completion risk, and prioritizes upcoming actions.
Detects unusual spending patterns in federal grant expenditures per 2 CFR §200.302-303 using isolation forest and statistical control methods.
Analyzes the impact of federal policy changes (executive orders, OMB guidance, agency directives) on an existing grant portfolio with compliance effort estimation and action plans.
Three steps to structured, auditable decisions.
Enter your federal awards with CFDA numbers, budget periods, and cost categories. Import from Grants.gov or SAM.gov, or upload award documents directly.
Analyze audit readiness, optimize cost allocations, forecast drawdowns, score subrecipient risk, and detect spending anomalies - all against 2 CFR 200 rules.
Track compliance scores over time, receive drift alerts when risk profiles change, and generate audit-ready evidence packages for Single Audit and agency reviews.
Spreadsheet compliance trackers
No version control, no scoring, no early warning - you find problems when auditors do
Manual cost allocation
Hours of spreadsheet work per allocation cycle with no optimization or defensible methodology
Siloed audit prep
Evidence scattered across email, shared drives, and filing cabinets - reassembled from scratch each cycle
Generic risk tools
Enterprise risk platforms that don't encode 2 CFR 200 rules and require heavy customization for grants